Sun storage not so good for web startups. Steer clear.
blogs.smugmug.com
blogs.smugmug.com
Firstly, the headline is at odds with the conclusion in the article; the article states that they would have preferred Sun's updated (fixed) product if it had been released at the time.
The headline takes one specific company's experience with one specific product and generalizes it to cover the vendor's entire storage product line.
The comment poster, Onethumb, has never commented or submitted to this site before.
I have no affiliation with Sun.
But anyone could've registered that name.
I'm also mildly amused that he went from Quake-related news to photo sharing (of course the Quake/gaming community is much different than how it was in the beginning).
If you're referring to the domain name - it looks like it was registered (or is at least affiliated) with SmugMug / Don MacAskill.
Try comparing $whois onethumb.com | grep "nserver" to $whois smugmug.com | grep "nserver"
I had a faint recollection that Don had used onethumb in the past, and the website was the best evidence after a quick Google.
Dell is good. Silicon Mechanics is good. Rackable is (generally) good. No name hardware can be the best, if you're careful on exact models. Testing is key, but there are some golden rules: Don't buy anything from Sun, Microsoft, Apple, Oracle, IBM, etc. These guys need insane profit margins to sustain their bloated businesses.