Wow, 98 is a great score (higher than Google!)
You're right, there's a lot of noise in the results. If the size reduction is small, like a few bytes, there's no need to show that.
You're right, there's a lot of noise in the results. If the size reduction is small, like a few bytes, there's no need to show that.
Something useful to add would be links for the compressed images you use to work out how compressing the images could save space. A side by side comparison would be pretty useful so I could see how the compressing changes the look of the page.
Just for fun I ran it over http://duckduckgo.com which comes back with 100. Google comes back with 98. Interesting.