>Six month ago, the yield curve inverted. People who should have known better said "this time is different."
How does your story jive with the fact that the yield curves went back to normal? Either they are an indicator or they aren't.
How does your story jive with the fact that the yield curves went back to normal? Either they are an indicator or they aren't.
Third option is that it is an indicator as long as people aren't treating it as one, but once people react to it then it ceases having the power to indicate what is happening.
Because after the inversion the market (and Fed) reacted? No indicator is infallible or static.