Stable perovskite-silicon printable solar cells with 25% efficiency
science.sciencemag.org
science.sciencemag.org
"Perovskite materials, such as methylammonium lead halides and all-inorganic cesium lead halide, are cheap to produce and simple to manufacture."
Preparing those silicon wafers is expensive, and perovskite avoids the need for them.
This could make multi-junction cells cheaper if they have solved some of the durability issues with perovskite.
But yeah everything I've read about perovskite is it's got problems with moisture. There are reports from the field of 30 year old silicon based panels that 'work fine'. Since solar panels have high capital costs the more durable, the lower the depreciation rate the better.
Edit: Just a caution. A lot of work was done over the last 50-60 years on alternatives to Silicon for semiconductors and outside of a few niches[1] they've all failed.
[1] Examples: Gallium Arsenide for high performance RF. Silicon Carbide for high temp power transistors. Various materials for LED's.
Commodity 156mm monocrystalline silicon cells can have ratings of 5.4W per cell now under STC (standard test conditions) meaning that a 72-cell panel can be rated at 390W. This is somewhere around a 20 to 22% cell efficiency.
Anything above 22% gets very costly, very quick.
There are all sorts of very expensive super high efficiency photovoltaic cell manufacturing methods. Even at 35% and above. Mostly of interest if you're building a telecom satellite and want the absolute best watts per square meter and watts per gram. Or if you get a solar cell manufacturer to donate some free cells to build an electric car to race across Australia.