Linux Weekly News (1998)
lwn.net
lwn.net
That brings back memories. I think the kernel didn't compile correctly with gcc again until at least 2.95.2 or 2.95.3?
https://slashdot.org/story/99/04/20/1453234/egcs-to-become-g...
The funny thing was, gcc 2.95.3 (being mostly egcs as you point out) was more stable than both previous versions of egcs and gcc. I distinctly remember gcc 2.8 having problems with the kernel, and egcs having problems with various userland stuff (mostly GNOME). Having to deal with two compiler forks each with their showstopper bugs seemed to go away rather markedly with 2.95.3.
EDIT: found a discussion which covers the idea that it was code in both the kernel/userspace which relied on UB or bugs of gcc 2.7.x
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.develo...
I've been subscribed ever since they offered them. A few years ago while starting up a business I realised that I hardly ever found or made the time to read them, and reluctantly let it slip. Jonathan emailed me personally to say thanks for being there from day one, and if I had any feedback. I explained, he said thanks anyway and then renewed my subscription! I've automatically renewed every year since then.