- Increased tweet length to 280 chars
- Tweet threads
- GIF integration
- Multiple UI revisions of desktop and mobile apps
There's also been a fair amount of work on ads and security, although these changes will be less apparent to most users.
- Increased tweet length to 280 chars
- Tweet threads
- GIF integration
- Multiple UI revisions of desktop and mobile apps
There's also been a fair amount of work on ads and security, although these changes will be less apparent to most users.
I don't question that those engineers are working hard. I'm sure they're not sitting around twiddling their thumbs. And I don't question that there aren't some genuinely hard, complicated problems to solve at Twitter, particularly around scaling and security. But from a structural perspective, I do still kind of wonder if companies the size of Twitter and Facebook aren't just an extended, very public example of Brooks's Law.
Anecdotally, I've been in large teams and small teams and I work equally hard in both environments. But even with the same amount of work, somehow, more stuff gets done and more products get shipped from the smaller teams.
In that sense it avoids the lazy cynicism of writing off whole groups of people as stupid or unmotivated (i. e. all of Dilbert). Instead, it's a starting point to consider how much we can still improve what's arguably humanity's claim to fame, the ability to cooperate.
This post should give you an idea of scale at Twitter. When I worked there, I spent about 2 months focused just on creating software to help automate the Clos migration mentioned. And there are just tons of things like this that are constantly being worked on.
https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/infrastruc...