For an article of such importance, to botch the visualisations so badly, to the point of being unreadable, is absurd. Can they not afford to get a designer or data viz person to spend a day and put the data in a decent choropleth map so we can actually see the maps clearly?
> Figure I Annual years of life lost from air pollution.
They didn't compensate for population density?
None of this matters. It's CO2 we should be worried about!!! That mostly harmless gas beneficial for plants is where the real pollution is, not those sulfur and nitrous oxides and other words too long for the average climate religion acolyte to remember! Carbon budget is a thing!!!