To me the tetragrammaton is a logical proof that approximates an “initial commit”.
To me the tetragrammaton is a logical proof that approximates an “initial commit”.
I looked up "Tetragrammaton" since I never heard of it[0], but I don't see how it would consist of a logical proof, I don't quite understand the significance. How do you reach your approximation from the tetragrammaton?
- somethingness
- becoming observable/“contrasty”
- germinating
- and becoming self-aware (and an applied practice)
Like a stack overflow of reality. It is one of many names of God in Hebrew.
This essentially represents “the all”, as we can understand it. It’s interesting how ancient alphabets were built on base concepts and interactions. They have a sort of philosophy to them.
Markov chain text generation is pretty wild, because we now can build computer systems that endlessly generate their own many-letter “names of God”. God has many names in Hebrew; everything is a name of God, so to speak, like a DNA sequence.