https://www.axios.com/cdc-lab-coronavirus-contaminated-6dc97...
However, CT scans are a much better, cheaper and economical way in clinical settings to confirm COVID-19[1]. Results come out in minutes and in negligible costs vs. thousands of dollars for RT-PCR testing. Chinese government's website has the most comprehensive guidelines and treatments recommendations on their official website.[4]
Washington State today is like the early January of Wuhan, where infections aren't officially confirmed even though it's been outbreak for weeks.
[1]: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200226151951.h...
[2]: https://www.wired.com/story/covid-19-will-mark-the-end-of-af...
[3]: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/29/health/coronavirus-prepar...
[4]: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-02/19/content_5480958.htm
Unfortunately CT scans have their own risk for the patient that traditional blood tests don't have.
Announcing funding cuts isn't the same as actually cutting them. The CDC budget won't be reduced until congress approves it. [1]
They have 20, 50, 100, 500 million test kits? No they do not. They're testing everyone? No they are not.
Why isn't the US testing everyone? There are nowhere near enough test kits to do it. There are not enough test kits to go around anywhere on the planet, not even remotely close.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/united-states-badly-...