The particular strike was implemented by withholding fall grades, which seems to unnecessarily burden students who are to be buried under crushing debt, no? Also, they are apparently unionized and this strike was against the extant agreements.
The consequences of not getting a grade can affect a student’s entire career and ability to sustain themselves financially.
I really have a terrible place in my heart for people who criticize protests because it caused a disruption.
That's the point of a protest.
I'm very happy for you that you've never felt the need to take these drastic steps, but they're protesting real issues and real problems they're having. The grades are ultimately the universities problem
It doesn't hurt the administration, it hurts the students.
Now the students are backing the administration!
However, by hurting students and adhering to draconian policies that serve to hurt more students, the school is paradoxically increasing support because the administration knows students are going to be enraged without looking into the nuance of why these things are happening to them, and who decides why these things should happen the way that they do.
Has the school asked for the exams to be returned, so they could be graded? I don’t know. I assume the graduate students wouldn’t turn them over anyways.
The university is free to make whatever rule they'd like to get around this, but instead go for maximum hurt to try to cut the legs off of this strike, and what is blowing me away is that this strategy by the university is working very effectively.
Even if they did average all my other work, I'd be pissed I put all that effort into something that has zero impact on my grade.
You're acting like the grad students have clean hands here which is clearly not true. They joined the union with the intent they would negotiate on their behalf. The union did so and promised to stop any wildcat strike. The students didn't like the job the union did, so they went on strike, violating the contract.
They didn't have a choice. The union then negotiated against their interests.
They likely joined UAW because they were already representing UCSC employees (bargaining power). Along with that comes the fact that union represents all members, not just you.
Dirsupting uninvolved people to get attention is self-serving and short-sighted. You do that to me and I will be against your cause for sure.
Also, I am saddened by your comment about withholding grades being an unnecessary "burden". That's the point of a strike. What do you think a strike is? They are withholding, not erasing grades, and the goal of the strikers is to force the university to pay attention. The true "unnecessary burden" is UC Santa Cruz not paying grad students enough to pay their rents. If the university had done so, then the grad students would not have had to try to get the administration's attention.
The likely reason only 54 went on strike is because most grad students were afraid for their jobs, which the university has shown to be well-founded.
This country amazes me. They seem to be crazy for low skilled labor but want to kick out high skilled ones.
The freakin union negotiated on behalf of the grad students and agreed to the contract!
Where was the union when that was happening?
They are playing dumb. They had every opportunity to bring up that issue when the contract was open.
I'm pretty sure what happened was the union decided that the deal was good enough for everyone they represented and threw the grad students under the bus.
The reductio ad absurdum here is an ER doctor striking and walking out while their patient's chest is wide open, claiming it was the hospital's problem and that they had been warning the hospital for weeks.
Is firing sufficient for punishment?