A parody Twitter account hits a nerve with Silicon Valley VCs
protocol.com
protocol.com
Do I think it's HN-worthy? Yes, I'd think some healthy criticism is definitively "mentally stimulating."
EDIT: Anyone who points out there are better parody accounts is missing the point somewhat: the tweets talk by themselves without the need for witty remarks.
I can actually relate to this on a personal level: After a medical issue wreaked havoc on pretty much every facet of my life over the course of a couple years, I got better and started putting the pieces of my life back together. One of the first things I did was start working again, and for the first time in years, had a job where I felt like I was being challenged and succeeding (my work performance was one of the things that suffered pretty terribly while sick, including having to take a ~year off). As you can imagine, I was really excited about this one thing going well in my life after years of being sick enough to be bad at everything, and I'd be straightforward when talking to friends about how well I was doing. Apparently, I have a few friends that have internalized the toxicity I'm describing: they're insecure enough about their careers that they couldn't even stand hearing someone speak positively about doing well at work, regardless of the context.
The VC case may be seen as okay because it's "punching up" in a way that wasn't true in my case. But "punching upwards" often just means defining your desired targets as "upwards", and using the phrase as an excuse to wallow in envy and toxicity, as if this is somehow salutary for either your mental health or for society.
This Twitter account isn't quite a big deal, and it's a very mild expression of this tendency. But seeing it as "calling out" something bad is entirely missing the point IMO.
[1] Here's the only example I found in the first dozen tweets which is actually mockable: https://twitter.com/VCBrags/status/1232396401763667970
This is a matter of taste, but I find this to be vastly superior:
"Contragts to XYZ!", and someone from XYZ may or may not thank the funders with a follow up. That is, there is no implicit association or expectation of getting something in return when you congratulate someone.
>I'd be straightforward when talking to friends about how well I was doing.
If you are talking to people in person, that has a different context from broadcasting to the world.
If anything, I'd expect mild self-promotion to be _more_ acceptable on the latter, since it serves as both a vehicle for personal and professional communication. Ie, "so proud to have been nominated for the [some award] for [book that I wrote]" is a pretty normal tweet on Twitter, and there's nothing especially wrong with it or mockable about it.
Sure, I guess my point was that this matter of taste (seeing the expression of pride in one's achievements as "seeking validation or neediness" in a bad way) is precisely the toxic cultural current that I was describing. In my anecdotal experience, it's usually driven by a heaping dose of self-hatred being externalized onto others by dragging them down.
Don't get me wrong, I find it funny. The current trend of humble brag is a good topic to laugh about.
But do you want an entire article about this? Do you want that to be on HN front page?
There are thousands of such joke accounts. Are we going to post about them all?
How about we deal with them on a case by case basis? Why this rush to post about them all or flag them all?
Don't get me wrong, I find your comment OK. The current trend of garbage comments with no content on HN is a good topic to laugh about.
But do you want an entire comment about this? Do you want that to be in an HN thread?
There are thousands of such joke accounts. Are you going to comment about them all?
I would LOVE to see the block list on this account. That’s actually worth printing on its own, and has a lot of utility for both entrepreneurs and LPs to understand VCs who lack the basic capability to handle public criticism. This isn’t even commentary that’s actually negative!
I always imagine how much it must suck to be a kid of one of these sorts of people. Mom/Dad goes on and on about how great they are, but will go nuclear when you point out what’s wrong... I knew a lot of kids growing up who ended up in therapy/rehab because of these sorts of parents.
I'll have to pay attention to this, to create a list of VCs to personally avoid.
But jokes aside, this is why we have sites like HN. To avoid the noise.
I may be in the minority but I include the person running it as well as stereotypical "kid who mocks everything without wit and thinks it makes them cool". They really lost me when they flagged one that was pointing out the obvious that the people evaluating companies have more specialized education than journalists. The denial that experts in their fields might know better than recalls real ugly anti-intellectualism.
Personally I think it is more "bad tactics" that bother me. VCs often deserve criticism for a variety of things anf may be oversensitive but this isn't it. It seems more like bullying than calling out. Especially with it so denuded of context (a fundamental problem with Twitter) it seems like twisting of words and context.
Anyway rambling aside I wonder how alone I am in this view and if I missed anything.