As far as I could tell from that conversation, she is anonymous and wants to stay that way. So RRC could be somebody massively well-known in the science world using this as a non-tenure approved outlet, or is masquerading as knowledgeable but is a patent clerk with no scientific credibility.
or is masquerading as knowledgeable but is a patent clerk with no scientific credibility.
It appears that these patent clerks with no scientific credibility are some of the few great things the patent office has bestowed upon us.
I don't think anyone could claim she's "masquerading" as knowledgeable, regardless of what (if any) formal education she's had.