these are not generally considered to all be equally plausible!
For example if someone asks me if I want tea or coffee and I know I don’t like coffee then I’m always going to choose tea irrespective of my free will.
This is just a crude example though, our psychology is infinitely more subtle. We are a subject to our experiences and those experiences start out against our control (due to us being kids). We are also a subject to our biology. If your body produces too much of one chemical or not enough of another then our moods could be drastically affected. We have cravings that are often chemical. Diet also plays a part too.
So much of what we think of as “free will” is actually circumstance that happened before the decision and biological states happening elsewhere in your body.
The more we know about the brain and mind, the less hiding room is left for free will and we haven't found it yet. It's looking pretty likely that free will just doesn't exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will#Libe...
https://www.paulanlee.com/2017/04/14/consciousness-and-the-m...
Dyson was a brilliant person, but I disagree with his quote there. I think we may develop a deep theory of consciousness (including solving "the hard problem") within the next century which will put some of these debates to rest.
https://aeon.co/ideas/panpsychism-is-crazy-but-its-also-most...