I'd buy that if there hadn't been approximately 48764576459674 "Rust vs Go" (well, more usually "this is why Rust is way better than Go and you're some kind of moron if you're not switching to Rust today") articles in the last few months.
I didn't see that anywhere in this article. Rust was just used to show an alternative approach.
"At this point in time, I deeply regret investing in Go.
Go is a Bell Labs fantasy, and not a very good one at that."
Certainly not C++, no?
I'm not questioning the critique - no language is perfect, and Go certainly has its share of problems. I'm questioning the sudden rash of "Rust is awesome, Go is shit" articles over the last few months. It's not a good thing.