Ex-MS engineer convicted of 18 felonies after stealing $10M in digital currency
geekwire.com
geekwire.com
>>Volodymyr Kvashuk, a 25-year-old software developer and Ukrainian citizen who worked for Microsoft from 2016 to 2018, took advantage of a testing program for Microsoft’s online retail sales platform. He made test accounts to obtain “currency stored value” such as Microsoft gift cards and then resold them online.
>>Kvashuk will be sentenced June 1 in U.S District Court and faces up to 20 years in prison.
Ouch.
He sold stolen goods for about 28% of their retail value. Is Microsoft is able to cancel the cards if they haven't been spent?
Something that caught the IRS's attention, apparently. Probably lots of deposits of real money to real banks, from a crypto exchange.
Saying Crypto isn't enough which is why he tried to say it was a 'family member gift' which he couldn't prove. Probably all he could show was that his currency came in from a mixer which is going to raise questions.
I'm surprised he didn't simply hold tether (if he wanted stable) and then drip it into his accounts.
On his tax returns he said bitcoins were a gift from a relative....unless his relative is ultra rich, no uncle is just going to gift you 3 million bucks. Plus, I am pretty sure you need to present documentation, the IRS will not just take your word for it. Honestly, any deposit over I think 10k is reported to the IRS by the banks, and IRS knows how much this guy is making, what he owns, etc.
Crypto currencies are not really as anonymous as supporters would like you to believe, and IRS will crush this guy.
In this case it appears that the IRS was brought in to it to correlate the individual's finances with the expected windfall, rather than instigating the investigation. That is, the investigators (in MS and law enforcement) knew who did it, and they were gathering further evidence.
"Under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), financial institutions are required to assist U.S. government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering, such as:
Keep records of cash purchases of negotiable instruments, File reports of cash transactions exceeding $10,000 (daily aggregate amount), and Report suspicious activity that might signal criminal activity (e.g., money laundering, tax evasion)"
True but I'm not sure it's feasible to conceal a theft of $10M from a large public corporation for very long if you don't work directly in finance or have IT access to financial records. Ultimately, double-entry accounting is going to show an imbalance somewhere as that $10M in gift cards is redeemed into actual cash at retail. Once the finance dept starts investigating why the books don't balance, it's only a matter of time until they narrow it down to approximately the right neighborhood.
He was stupid not to realize they would eventually start looking for where the missing money went. The only way he might have gotten away with it was to cash it quickly and very carefully disappear under another identity somewhere outside the U.S. forever.
There's a reason why money laundering is a criminal specialty.
He needed to stop stealing and fencing the goods before getting caught, wait a few months or years without doing anything shady at all, then start dripping the ill-gotten gains into his account alongside an entirely legitimate cashflow, a little bit at a time.
Buying a mansion and a roadster out of the blue is an "stupid criminals get caught; all criminals are stupid" type of move.
Even if all you know of crime comes from the movie theater and television set, you'd know that after the airport job in Goodfellas, some of the guys got whacked for violating the "don't buy anything!" edict. In Breaking Bad, the car wash and the Pollos Hermanos chicken restaurants were necessary for laundering the methamphetamine revenue.
I think the mention of Bitcoin mixers was just chaff. The guy was caught because his bank tattled on him, and the IRS didn't buy his flimsy sourcing story. If he had just kept the proceeds as some variety of cryptocurrency, he might not have gotten away with it entirely, but the investigation would probably still be ongoing--the questions remaining to be answered being, of course, "how much did he steal, exactly?" and "how do we seize and forfeit those funds?" Someone might know that he was stealing something, but they wouldn't necessarily know how much.