> Contrary to determinism would be true magic.
I used to think like this, that somehow underneath the apparent randomness of quantum mechanics there is a deterministic process that is either being sampled too slowly or too granular to see its fundamentally discrete nature.
Unfortunately that is not the case. No experiment has ever measured a significant deviance from truly random for a quantum-mechanical experiment. We have no better description for the outcome of quantum experiments than the probability distributions that come out of the Schroedinger equation.
Welcome to theory from 80 years ago, backed by every single experiment ever done in the intervening time.
The bottom of our universe is math manipulating probability equations, and we can't see beneath it.
Sorry. I was hopeful too.