I'm only anecdotal, but by comparison, prior the ACA, my insurance for a family of 3 was $300/month with a $2500/year deductible. That $300/$5000 plan was considered predatory and high deductible.
The first plan offered to me under the ACA was something like $700/month with an $8000 deductible. Plans this year were ~$950/month with a ~$15,000 deductible. It's Cadillac pricing and one-star benefits.
Meanwhile, my "non-compliant, high deductible" plan from a private market is $400/month with a $5000/deductible.
I opted out of ACA - it made sense to opt out even when I had to pay the $2100/year penalty, because the premiums and the deductible were still less. I qualify as "underinsured", but that couldn't be farther from the truth. My plan can be irritating to use, but they have online self-service tools for providing healthcare, and I have never been questioned about paying for necessary treatments. I pay them, they pay the doc. Very simple.
For people who relied on private insurance and weren't destitute, the ACA has been a shit-show from day one.
The only highlight to the ACA for me is the hundreds of thousands in billables I've accrued helping institutions become "compliant" with the ACA.
I thought plans had to be aca compliant.
1. 42% make too much to qualify for premium subsidies but elect not to purchase coverage, typically because it's unaffordable or just not worthwhile (the sibling commenters mentioning their expensive, crappy plans fall into this group).
2. 27% qualify for Medicaid, meaning that they could get coverage approximately free but they either don't know how or don't bother to sign up.
3. 22% qualify for partially subsidized coverage, but either they don't think the coverage is worth the money, they don't know how to sign up, or they just don't bother.
4. 9% are in the coverage gap - they live in states that didn't expand Medicaid and make too little to qualify for premium subsidies.
https://www.kff.org/uninsured/issue-brief/a-closer-look-at-t...
Thankfully the COBRA loophole meant I could avoid paying the costs if I ended up finding a job quickly, but during that period I was travelling with a check for the full amount of the insurance just in case.
Now imagine that but far worse for someone who couldn't actually afford any of those costs.
Because I'm a software developer and I make decent money, I didn't qualify for any tax credits or discounts. The cheapest health insurance plan that I could find cost twice as much as just paying both the ACA penalty and the Massachusetts state penalty. It made more financial sense to just go without insurance.
I can imagine that a lot of young software developers and other people who do contract work find themselves in similar situations.
See the bottom of this for a graphic: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2... also the removal of the individual mandate probably contributed to the gap.
[0] https://www.irs.gov/affordable-care-act/individuals-and-fami...
Probably a very immature view on this, but still, I see no reason to sacrifice my health in terms of food and quality of life for health insurance. Won't that just increase the likelihood of me becoming sick and needing healthcare to begin with?