We keep pulling from the same small pool of rich, connected household names and expect different results.
Why is this comment downvoted?
Maybe because "Bloomberg bankrolls a social-media army" ;-)
Linking to an external image and then making a conclusion here isn't profitable to discussion here. It'd been better if the op had said, and here's Bloomberg with Trump and Clinton (I forget the 4th guys name: I'm oz)... all of them clearly golf buddies.