Fan Fiction in the 1700s
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
On a related non-sexual note Lancelot has them topped in the 13th century as a later blatantly out of place French addition. It is only somewhat of a joke to call him a Mary Sue who crept into canon. Mostly because the concepts didn't appear to exist in the same way you couldn't call copying a book in a library by hand copyright infringement.
Also i love the idea of the site, and the idea of fan fiction being an opportunity teach the youths to write stories (to a degree, for instance i also worry too many professional instagram photographers can make you feel like you cant shoot photography) Im honestly waiting for a “github” for stories, movies, graphic novels, etc. Perhaps one already exists, perhaps someone’s using github as such.
With early work it’s hard to draw the line between evolution of a story and what we would call fanfiction.
Don Quixote on the other hand was known as a fictional character invented by an author. Creating new works based on another authors fictional characters and universe constitutes IMHO a distinct genre.
To put it in modern terms, Dante didn't infringe anyone's copyright, although he might be liable for libel.
It’s like how Superman’s source material is self contradictory where individual works are different. So, you can have Smallville fanfiction or more generic Superman mythology fanfiction.