Uh, US poverty in 1900 was immense. This was the era of the Wobblies, The Jungle and the Robber Barons. Yes, a variety of radical ideas appeared about then. Why?? Look at the conditions...
It seems like length abuse is creeping into HN...
Uh, US poverty in 1900 was immense. This was the era of the Wobblies, The Jungle and the Robber Barons. Yes, a variety of radical ideas appeared about then. Why?? Look at the conditions...
It seems like length abuse is creeping into HN...
Government limited to the enforcement of property rights allows each of us to accumulate capital.
But some of us are smarter, work harder and defer consumption. They can accumulate more than others. There is nothing wrong with that.
Then mass production and mass media came along, enabling some to sell what they produced to millions of people and accumulating a lot more. Still no crime committed.
In fact, the average person benefits when others are able to produce a lot with little effort. Things become cheaper.
And those who save rather than consuming benefit us too. We can borrow their money and invest in improving our own productive abilities.
Its true that those who commit crimes and get away with it also can accumulate wealth, but that doesn't mean that those who've respected the rights of others don't deserve what they've accumulated.
People talk about the "Robber Barrons" but this is really a pejorative. Standard oil, for instance was able to lower the cost of gasoline dramatically, I believe it was more than an order of magnitude. This paved the way to the car being a viable product for the middle class and eventually nearly everyone.