Cancer is not a disease, but a state of overall body deterioration. You can't fix it; only the body can fix itself.
Stop attacking it with carbs and plant oils, and give it the fuel it needs: unprocessed animal protein and fat.
Stop attacking it with carbs and plant oils, and give it the fuel it needs: unprocessed animal protein and fat.
Stop attacking it with splints, plaster casts and slings, and give it the fuel it needs: unprocessed yellowcake Uranium.
...and give it what the body craves: Brawndo, its got electrolytes.
That would have been way better.
It is incorrect and irresponsible to blame people who get cancer for eating badly etc. Sometimes things go wrong at a cellular level and cancer happens.
Actually mortality rates are at all times high, globally.
However if one looks there has been tremendous progress in some cancers. As an example CML went from a swift death sentence to something approaching a chronic condition.
The standard survival rates are quoted as 5 year survival unless the cancer is particularly aggressive eg pancreatic. The statistics around cancer are very high quality and public in most countries. However, I suspect data will not influence your view.
'A 2006 analysis concluded that “without reductions in smoking, there would have been virtually no reduction in overall cancer mortality in either men or women since the early 1990s.'
Take it or leave it.
I like your citations. They make me think about a recent radio interview in Canada where an MD was discussing cervical Cancer. He would not say that vaccination for HPV prevented Cervical Cancer. He would only say that it prevented pre-cancerous lesions and Cervical cancer "is never seen without pre-cancerous lesions".
I can understand using scientific rigour to avoid jumping to conclusions. However it makes me wonder about Louis Pasteur and the discovery of micro-bacterial disease origins. Would he have said: "I can't say that these bacteria causes disease X but we have never seen disease X without the presence of these bacteria." ?
All that to say perhaps medical research has been going down the wrong path with Cancer. We have one clear case of viral "involvement". :-)
How big a stretch is it to extend research in that direction and look for more cases?
But not all cancers are caused by virus. Probably some of the multiple toxic compounds in the smoke of tobacco is the most known case. Radiation is also a well known cause. Even more info https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogenesis
"...developed a new method to identify cancer viruses based on computer subtraction of human sequences from a tumor transcriptome, called digital transcriptome subtraction (DTS)"
It's from 2008. There has been enormous improvements in DNA technology since that time.