With no brand license, Blackberry Mobile fades to black
zdnet.com
zdnet.com
- Long-press a key to capitalize a letter.
- Text auto-correction that's customizable, predicable, deterministic, and easily undoable/re-doable.
- A dedicated widget for moving the cursor around and selecting text, without having to resort to complicated and unreliable gestures.
- Forward delete.
- The many keyboard commands/shortcuts for power users.
To type the letter in upper case, hold down the Shift key and move your finger over to the letter. Same thing with numbers and punctuation but hold down the Numbers key.
though recent ios update seems to have made it auto-highlight a word after moving. so for instance if i move the cursor up to start of sentence it will highlight the first word which is hard to deselect.
My iphone has so many features that I didn't know existed until someone showed me how to swipe (last one I learned, 3 finger swipe for 'undo', useful when I accidentally delete some text)
https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/type-and-edit-text-ip...
Without it you can hold on the space bar to enter a trackpad-type mode, but this is a poor substitute.
With 3D Touch, you could press a little harder than normal anywhere on the keyboard to enter the trackpad mode, but then you could press hard again to switch to word selection mode, which functioned much like a click-and-drag on a trackpad.
Very difficult to describe and admittedly very unintuitive, but once you got the muscle memory down it was so efficient.
I loathe the fact that everything that 3D Touch used to do has been replaced by a long press. Everything feels so sluggish now.
If someone produced a Q10 with fresher hardware and Android compatibility I'd buy it in a heartbeat.
The half-qwerty thing was fantastic, and the little trackball was nice too. The magnetic case was super cool. I could type way faster on it than I've ever been able to do on any soft keyboard. The full multicolor notification LED was cool too.
When that phone was current, it was easily at feature parity with anything else on the market (except maybe in screen size). Everything about it was just as polished as hell. I always thought it was a shame that Blackberry could never really figure out how to keep their lead. Apple and Google ate their lunch bigtime.
I think where Apple really beat Blackberry was iTunes and the web-browser. Back in the iPhone classic days, it didn't have any kind of app-store or anything. But the web-browser and iTunes were big draws onto the platform. And once iOS had enough users to support an app-store ecosystem, it was all over for Blackberry. Google came along for the ride too of course, but IMO Android wouldn't be where it is if Apple hadn't figured out how to market smartphones.
Of course - the last real nail in Blackberry's coffin was Outlook support on iOS and Android. That basically broke Blackberry's stranglehold on corporate devices, and it turned out that the platform wasn't strong enough to stand without that.
Also it was stupid as hell that Blackberry forced its users onto specialized phone plans with a Blackberry addon feature.
I've gone back and forth with smartphones but I never really enjoyed them. It's not a requirement for work so it just turns into an unproductive timesink.
I was using it as my daily phone a couple years ago and the only things i missed was a flashlight and maps. I'm thinking about going back.
What killed the brand was the huge discount they put on the 8* models that ended up in the hands of teenagers, remember that BlackBerry messenger was the one behind the London Riots.
The physical keyboard was really nice but the rest of the phones just weren’t. If they’d shipped a WebKit browser earlier it might have helped but they really hit a hubris-assisted low point floundering for years right when Apple and even Google started executing very well.
The best case might have been a Microsoft acquisition and doubling down on enterprise integration and features like the really nice one they added for locking down your work account from your personal data on the phone.
I still remember the BlackBerry Storm, the first all touchscreen device from RIM. It was years behind the iPhone. The UI felt rushed and clunky, the keyboard was unusable and there wasn't any app support. It didn't even support WiFi, something the original iPhone did, and it tanked performances. It was an exercise in cargo cult at best and really showed that they didn't understand the technical aspect at all since they allowed their competitor to have 2 years of advance on them.
They were wrong on Moore's law (So was Microsoft who moved Phones to WindowsNT too late) and very wrong on ergonomics (Physical keyboards are NOT essential).
I think RIM focused way too much on its existing userbase and on pleasing carriers rather than looking at were the market was going to be in 3-5 years. Even back in 2008-2009 I remember execs showing off their iPhones and as soon as the BlackBerry users saw one most of them wanted in. And these were the buyers of the flagship models RIM shipped at the time, not the cheaper phones aimed at teenagers.
Finally, they failed to attract talent. The type of folks who interned at RIM generally didn't end up working there.
Apple (and Google with Android) both shipped platforms. RIM kept shipping a tool.
I don't know if Blackberry bought their own lie, or if they thought it would get them a bit further than it did, but as far as I can tell they never really came up with something that really was better than the iPhone. The lie was a debt they never paid back.
Anyway, that was my take, looking in from the outside.
RIM had an engineering-first culture that was attuned to the needs of enterprise customers and wireless carriers first and foremost. Those customers prioritized email delivery over bandwidth-constrained mobile networks. RIM made big money off of Blackberry Enterprise Services (BES), which included dedicated servers to handle push email and compress web traffic for improved speed.
When the engineer CEO Mike Lazaridis saw the iPhone, he thought it'd fail because AT&T's 2G and 3G networks would collapse trying to load desktop websites and online video.
Which they did. The biggest complaint about the early iPhone in the US was that it dropped calls, and that websites loaded slowly (this was before responsive websites, srcset, CDN caching etc were common).
Ultimately it didn't matter, because consumers and businesspeople wanted the iPhone and accepted the tradeoffs.
Microsoft was always going to beat Palm/Symbian with Windows CE because they built a powerful multitasking OS that was terrible on the hardware of the day but the hardware got better. Palm had a super simple OS that ran great on early hardware but was quickly outclassed and they constantly struggled with modernizing it.
Apple then destroyed them all by porting their desktop/server OS to mobile hardware!
They either were not that great at executing and more sales focused or magically got poached quite heavily.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2537517/apple-adds-exc...
after all if your platform is popular enough you'll have devs willing to learn whatever arcane mess of a stack they have to in order to make money on it
While the keyboard was a sales win (or at least an attempted one) for the end users, their key USP for many corporates was more secure comms than other devices offered.
Then there were discussions about some government agencies wanting access, and talk of some being given access in some jurisdictions in some circumstances. I'm not sure how true that talk was, but it got some peoples hackles up significantly as it implied back doors existed in the system.
Then there was the infamous CEO interview walkout when a (related?) question about security was raised, which really left a bad image and killed a lot of hope the company may have had regarding getting the security reputation back. Losing that USP was, while far from the only factor, rather significant in BBs precipitous drop in popularity.
Once other phones started handling email just as well and became as reliable, Blackberry didn't have a reason to exist other than for those that wanted a basic email phone with a keyboard.
The Blackberry phones I remember in the pre-2010 era were not as good for media as other phones. Of course the whole landscape changed once iPhone gained traction and Android entered the scene, I'm sure the newer Blackberrys were a bit better but by that time everyone seemed to be getting Android or iPhones.
I recall Blackberry needing special phone plans as well, not sure if that still exists anymore.
IIRC secure email was their USP to corporates.
> and didn't need to be reset as often as Windows Mobile ... I do remember the Blackberry taking a full two minutes to start up from a cold
That was true of Windows phones too, even the highish-end device I had for a fair while.
> Once other phones started handling email just as well
It wasn't that other devices did basic email less well, it was that they didn't make the same security claims. Once those security claims were in doubt (rightly or wrongly) other devices looked a lot less different in that regard so other factors became key to sales and the BB proposition was not as competitive in those areas. Once the "all the corporates use BB, so all the corporates use BB" bubble had broken, BB never recovered the mindshare they once had.
I actually feel that a lot of "enterprise support" on iPhone was a side-effect of having a lot of users trying to use their personal iPhone instead of their corporate BlackBerry for work.
The Keyboard thing ended-up being true for, I estimate, less then 10% of users?
But apple's soft keyboard is VERY good. Android's ... tolerable.
It became a lie.
> I really wish someone would do a phone UI that is a lot more text focused.
It has to be consistent, otherwise there's little point. BB10 had one-button keyboard shortcuts everywhere—it was baked into the OS, and it worked really well.
Part of the reason it worked well is that there were standards. Backspace was always "delete", C was always "create" or "compose", I/O was zoom in/out, T/B was scroll to top/bottom—you get the picture. Keyboard shortcuts typically corresponded with menu items, and the shortcut would be shown in the menu. It's not like desktop multi-key shortcuts that are super hard to remember. Mostly because BB10 shortcuts were contextual.
On the home screen, long-pressing a key would also open an app, which you could customise at will.
I still miss my Bold 9000 and Bold 9700, which had by far the best ever keyboards. I remember typing entire college assignment papers on those while on the bus or train. Their Docs app exported to .docx, so I'd email a copy to myself and open it on my desktop to pick up where I left off.
Started my enterprise career supporting these things. Won’t miss BES one bit.