Bill Gates just bought a $645M super yacht powered by liquid hydrogen
esquireme.com
esquireme.com
So yes - often a byproduct of oil production, but if the oil companies had it their way, they'd burn it on the spot.
I think this makes the title misleading: we're not even sure that he invested in a boat that does not exist yet.
> a $645 million 100% green luxury super yacht
> meaning that its only emission will be water
Production by-products aside, hydrogen production is majorly the processing of fossil fuel[^1], which rejects carbon monoxide. Introducing the boat as 100% green is misleading.
"Liquid hydrogen" I guess makes for some splashy headlines but I'm doubtful about the practicality. Hydrogen boils at -253C (20K). This is not a trivially achieved and maintained temperature.
NASA used this for the Saturn V, which largely explains why the Saturn V is still the most powerful rocket ever flown. To compare:
- Liquid hydrogen + liquid oxygen has a specific impulse of 450
- SpaceX's Merlin engine uses RP-1 (kerosene) and liquid oxygen for a specific impulse of 250-300
The demands of the Falcon 9 are lower of course (not exceeding geostationary orbit, for a second ignoring the Falcon Heavy variant) but this affords SpaceX the luxury of using a fuel that is much cheaper to store and use.
This goes beyond cold however. Hydrogen atoms are incredibly small (fun fact: helium atoms are smaller). This makes leakage a huge problem. It also gets in between the atoms of whatever storage material you're using (for fusion reactors this problem is called "helium embrittlement").
So do I believe this will turn into something real? Let's just say I have my doubts.