> We do need to find solutions for blade-waste.
Why? We're in no danger of running out of space, and they're not toxic.
Why? We're in no danger of running out of space, and they're not toxic.
But in this particular situation: a quarter-century-old turbine blade has paid for itself so many times over already that this is just not where we need to be spending out time worrying about efficiencies. Even if we just bury the things, wind power remains (by far!) the most environmentally beneficial choice for almost all electrical markets.
If they're blowing around in the wind or dumped in the waterways, sure. If they're buried, none I've heard of.
See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5373626 for example.
(In political practice, it seems easier to throw around subsidy dollars, alas.)