Hacker News Reader

Comment by yjftsjthsd-h | Hacker News Reader

I keep hearing this, and I don't understand it. Windows is just so... messy. At my last job I kept a Windows VM for Skype (S4B) and the odd non-portable app, but I wouldn't want that on bare metal.

I don't have experience with Darwin; maybe the experience is better there.

View on HN

Whenever I try to use linux on hardware, either audio doesn't work without stuttering, video doesn't work without tearing or some package manager dependency issue rears its ugly head. From my perspective, it seems inconceivable to run linux on (personal) hardware.

That being said, I am very unhappy with windows 10 at work, and would much rather have some older windows version. At some point windows probably will become shitty enough that linux might seem like a viable alternative.

What hardware are you installing it on?

> video doesn't work without tearing

NVidia, closed blob - no way to fix, contact support

> audio doesn't work without stuttering,

can't remember problems with audio last 5 years.

One thing that probably taints my perspective: the majority of machines that I have used, at home and work, have been thinkpads and business-class Dells, so I've always enjoyed excellent hardware support. Without that, I'd understand the balance being different.

You sort of answered about understanding the question with your comment about Skype.

Lots of work places are Windows / Office effectively only. Many places have a SOE that is windows only. At home I play games sometimes. Again, that drives Windows.

Also drivers, power issues and various other issues still crop up on Linux more than Windows or MacOS.

Also, working on a VM is nice in a way because it means if it gets stuffed up, just start again quickly.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com