Why I no longer trust EMC
dbmsmusings.blogspot.com
dbmsmusings.blogspot.com
Needless to say I was quite happy that I tried the restore before I actually needed it. And also that I'm not a Mozy customer anymore, although I'm still paying them so I guess technically I am - but that's just because they refuse to cancel my subscription and keep charging my credit card.
Lesson learned: stay away from Mozy, and EMC for that matter.
Ignore Yale's process, go to the computer store that night get a new hard drive and swap it out. 500GB laptop hard drives cost approximately $60. What was the cost of not having your computer for 2 months?
Also, here's another case of don't outsource your bread and butter. You have no control over what Mosy does with your data, and you're relying on trust alone that it will be there when you need it. Why would you think that a company you aren't paying will treat you as well as you'd treat yourself?
If you want someone to be mad at, be mad at yourself for being a dumb consumer.
I worked for a company that only union members from facilities were allowed to rearrange your office. So moving a file cabinet was impossible. You couldn't do it without stealing work, and there was no way your department would pay to have something like that done for you. The same went for changing the height of your height adjustable desk, getting a whiteboard screwed on the wall (instead of leaning against the wall while sitting on the desk) or even moving your computer from one side of the desk to the other.
Sometimes you just had to do it anyway and hope the union guy who empties your trash doesn't notice.
Does this mean “cloud” fails? Hell no……
If my hard drive failed I'd be recovering the data back somewhere, anywhere (e.g. a VPS), within hours.
I sympathize, because in the last 10 years I've probably "OKed" over 100,000 pages of TOS, and not read a single one.
The fact that all his files were gone and he didn't know it means one of two things: either they are disorganized, or pretty fucking nonchalant about wiping user data. Either is unacceptable in a backup company.
So no, it has nothing to do with customer service. Its someone who A) was using a free service and B) never bothered logging in to make sure his data was still being hosted by said free service.
You can remove this restriction by upgrading to Mozy Pro, for only $9.95/month."
Wham. Informs the customers, let's them fix their problem & gives them an alternative if they don't want to do this every 30 days.
Instead they elected to delete his data w/o giving a warning besides something deep in their ToS. There was a failure with him getting back into his account. When he finally got in and found out his data was gone, they basically sent him canned responses from customer service reps who obviously don't have the power to help customers. The only thing that saved his data was being able to write a angry blog post which caught the attention of Mozy PR. Surprise! Surprise! The data actually wasn't deleted after all.
Needless to say, if they really didn't have the data, then that would make them seem better in my eyes. The fact that they did have the data, but their customer service rep didn't have the power or the training to find it - or maybe he did but was not allowed to divulge it to a non-paying customer just reeks of mismanagement.
A Customer Service fail, in this case, is identical to a technical fail - his data is Gone, Gone, Gone, and all he's got for it is platitudes.
It seems common sense to me that you should have at a very minimum:
- Continuous onsite backup onto a different physical device (e.g. Time Machine on ext. HDD)
- Weekly or monthly backups onto a different physical device kept offsite (e.g. ext. HDD in a safe deposit box)
- Continuous cloud-based backup (e.g. Backblaze, Mozy, etc.)
I personally use Backblaze as a last resort, in case my laptop HDD fails and something happens to my Time Machine backups. The probability of this is so low, if it happens I'll be happy to pay $200 for them to send me a hard drive.
Also, IMHO it seems ridiculous to me to expect restoring tens of GB over HTTP to work flawlessly. One of the reasons I chose Backblaze is that they have the ability to physically send me my data. Web restore is for the files you can't live without until the package from Backblaze arrives.
(formatting edits)
Providing services costs money, and it's entirely acceptable for the provider to terminate non-paying users' services at any time. Of course, it's much better if they do it after a while and with a warning (which Mozy apparently did do), but it's unfortunate that the email was lost.
In summary, I don't think people have much right to complain that the service they were getting for free wasn't provided in perpetuity as well. If you wanted reliable service, I think the 5 GBP/mo isn't too much to pay to ensure that your files are safe.
Plus, Hybir does an image backup so you can use a boot CD to restore your HDD to the exact state it was in at the time of the backup. They de-dupe across all their clients so for online backup you only have to upload a small percent of your total data as much if (like Windows 7 files) will already be in their repository.
I certainly feel a lot better about having BOTH an online backup and a local offline backup. I believe CrashPlan offers the same option, but without the image-style backup/restore.
The fact it is not a service has lots of positive benefits for me:
The company can die and I can still recover my files (there's an open source recovery tool on github - https://github.com/sreitshamer/arq_restore
It also does away with some of the stupid restrictions typically found with Backblaze/Mozy with respect to backing up network drives.
Incremental backups are lightning fast.
It keeps a "Time Capsule" style incremented history of your recently changed files.
oh wait