Election turnout in SF is abysmally low. Those who do turn out are mostly homeowners who really want to keep the prices growing.
There is a 2-term (8-year) term limit (each member can run for re-election 1 single time before being termed out), so this summary is false on its face.
In recent elections several incumbents have won re-election by only 2 or 3 percent. It is entirely plausible for an unpopular member to be unseated by a well organized challenge.
Before 20 years ago, the elections were at-large, so what you’re going on with this complaint is a pretty short time frame (maybe a couple dozen individual elections involving an incumbent).
The SF board of supervisors (and its elections) doesn’t seem materially different than other American political offices.