Some of the aircraft flown by the USAF and the US Navy have higher annual operational costs than the sticker price of those same aircraft. The F-35 is an attempt to avoid repeating the same mistakes, but obviously, easier said than done.
Some of the aircraft flown by the USAF and the US Navy have higher annual operational costs than the sticker price of those same aircraft. The F-35 is an attempt to avoid repeating the same mistakes, but obviously, easier said than done.
Buy a kayak for $100? You need around $100/yr in storage, cleaning and upkeep for it.
Buy a glider for $10k? You need around $10k/yr in maintenance, hangarage, taxes, insurance etc.
Buy a jet for $1M? You’ll spend that much on a hanger, crew, fuel, taxes, mechanics, parts, insurance etc etc.
Get an aircraft carrier for $1B? You’ll spend that much on crew, ports, maintenance, munition, training etc etc.
Sure you _can_ do it cheaper, but it’s a good rule of thumb from a budgetary point of view.
I think that if nothing else is learned from this program, it's that 'cost estimates' regarding it fit someplace between 'meaningless' and 'fraudulent'.