Update: I added answers.yahoo.com as well, which has consistently terrible content and yet is often highly ranked.
For an extreme example: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071113122412AA... (Warning: Taboo. And the answer probably isn't relevant to 95% of the posters here. :)
Compare for example the Apache archives of CouchDB (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/) to Markmail archives (http://couchdb.markmail.org/search/?q). The former is searchable; the other isn't.
[I run osdir.com] Just to be clear we're not scraping content nor SEOing to death. We've been running our mailing list archive for almost 8 years.
To quote Matt_Cutts somewhere else in this thread: 'because USENET/mailing lists don't always have a centralized/canonical location on the web, which makes dupe content more of a potential issue. It's not the usual "Website X copied my website" scenario.'
If you dislike us that's cool, but just know we're not showing in your SERPs because of scraping & SEO trickery. A lot of people, maybe not you, really are finding their answer there. There's a lot of solid answers in inboxes.
UI: LOL, yeah, it's a toss up here whether to make it prettier or keep it a bit old school.
Would be interesting to have collective access to what people are blocking.
I like the approach...being able to click and exclude based on the search results that pop up.