New russian helicopter can land on top of Mount Everest, never ages
en.rian.ru
en.rian.ru
"We need a professional sounding English narrator. British accent, of course, it's more refined. But not a native speaker... that's too ordinary. We need someone who's faking a British accent. Also, random word emphasis is a plus."
English curriculum in Soviet schools was meant to be based on British English, but of course precious few teachers ever traveled to the UK or interacted with Britons.
http://www.everestnews.com/stories2005/everestcopter05272005...
I'd have thought that most problems with helicopters come from the engines and other complex parts, not the fuselage.
The fuselage and avionics are typically the most expensive parts of an any aircraft.
It uses much more power to lift off when stationary because there is no translational lift.
So if the helicopter is at maximum power while moving, it has no "extra" power to hover or land gently or take off. It can fly as high as Everest, but it can't land or takeoff.
I remember reading (I think it was "Chickenhawk", great book) that some pilots in Vietnam with an overloaded helicopter stuck on a ridge would basically drop it off the side of the ridge to get some forward speed before they would recover and climb up to altitude. That takes guts.
While I'm telling anecdotes, a long time friend had always wanted to fly, it was his dream, so he joined the Air Force after school. He passed the basic ab-initio training with flying colours and got assigned to heavy transports. He quit after two years. I was very surprised and asked him why. He said he was so scared he couldn't handle it. (He wouldn't say what, but I assume something like short landings at night on unmade strips in the middle of the bush, etc.)
Evacuating troops and dropping supplies there is difficult to put it lightly.