Oldest Material on Earth Discovered
bbc.com
bbc.com
does this imply that cosmic rays have been constant for half the age of the universe? or at least have a predictable decay rate? or is this just a weak analogy?
Also, even if the rate of cosmic rays has been constant, would it make sense that the impact of said rays on any body would be perfectly uniform? Wouldn't it follow a normal/gaussian distribution, such that some parts of the meteorite received a bit more cosmic rays, and some a bit less? Do the "ages" they found follow such a distribution?
Everything in space spins, from the smallest speck of dust to entire galaxies. Put a stationary object in space, in light, and that light will start it spinning. So we would expect cosmic rays to be uniform across the surface.
So if there is a big radiation source due "north", there should be less radiation received on the "south" side.
A more honest statement: "We measured Ne-21 in meteorite minerals in higher concentration than on similar Earth minerals. We think it's caused by cosmic rays. We have no clue where the cosmic rays came from or when."