Quantum Computing explained with a hands-on tutorial in 10 mins
medium.com
medium.com
> teleportation might be a reality ;).
Please say "quantum teleportation" instead of "teleportation" so readers don't confuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleportation. They are completely different concepts.
> That notion of both “dead and alive” is exactly what superposition is.
No, this is not what superposition is. The cat example was Schrödinger’s method of illustrating how counter-intuitive quantum superposition is. Please refer to the superposition principle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle) instead.
> But what if you could entangle them together so both would always guarantee to yield the same outcome? That’s what entanglement is all about.
This is not what entanglement is all about. You say "both their wave functions will yield the same outcome." It's the same wave-function when they are entangled, not different ones.
The superposition part though, maybe I could've been more clearer, but I meant to imply the "being in both states" is what superposition meant. I saw it being similar to the coin example conceptually. Or was the coin example supposed to be a more proper representative of the concept?
Don't avoid math. You can't explain superposition and entanglement correctly without it. I didn't need to read those sections to figure out that they were incorrect. I just looked for some notation like vectors, matrices e.t.c.. and I didn't see any.