Judging by the downvotes I assume a few of the people from groups 1-5 are here. There are no scientifically founded reason be be against vaccines/nuclear/GMO, so grouping these things together by the parent comment should not be offensive to anyone
Then discussion moved to if nuclear plant will be replaced by coal plant, is it really that better in the end? When faced that question, it was observed that anti-nuclear movement splits, where one side thinks that nuclear makes sense to stop coal, while another thinks that we must ban nuclear even if whole planet will die from climate change.
This is why, at least in Germany, some parts of anti-nuclear movement can be perceived as somewhat radical.
It’s intellectually dishonest, lazy and counterproductive to groups everyone that you disagree with. That means that you never actually cared to understand the arguments.