How Long Will Australia Be Livable?
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
Conversely, if we can't live in Australia, with at least some naturally occurring water, then we need to give up on the pipedreams of fleeing to a new unspoiled planet and start to seriously address what's actually happening here.
> like the ANZACs at Gallipoli, we have to rethink our strategy
Alternatively, like most military disasters, the arrogant leaders that were thousands of miles from the frontline will learn nothing and continue to make decisions that get people killed. While using nationalism to bolster their support.
To address the article: The will for any community to remain in place will be stronger than we anticipate I think, as this is a long term issue it's hard to imagine people thinking far enough ahead to start dismantling communities now. The impetus needed to overcome the inertia of moving a community is enormous, and as harsh as this year has been it is still the same flavour of challenges we currently deal with so it's easy to feel complacent. Once these fires go out, watch as Australia marches through the year like nothing happened and headlong into next summer. We might be lucky and some smart cookies will pass some more funding to the fire services so we can protect our communities. Repeat until unrepeatable.
In the short term I think we'll see changing management of forests and communities surrounded by them. We need to think hard about communities and homes living at the interface between bush and mankind. We need to get better at separating community from bushland, so we can let these fires burn and keep the fuel in the forests at non-catastrophic levels and the vegetation and fauna healthy.
The Aborigines have lived here for 60-odd thousand years without too much trouble by the look of it. While European settlement is hitting hard limits after a mere 250 years.
Also GDP of 0
Dont try and compare.. its like comparing a apple and a 4 bedroom apartment.
http://www.sydneywater.com.au/SW/water-the-environment/how-w...
And regards to your “pithy” comment I do believe you’re off base. FWICT ecologists, biologists, and foresters are at a bit of a loss. We’re losing territory that simply doesnt burn in the normal cycle. To quote myself, The fires have been much larger and hotter than typical. The vegetation that does regrow probably wont be the same as we lost, ie pyrophillic scrubland replacing forrest. The fires are also destructive enough to destroy pyrophytic plants that would resist previous bushfires. Both of these are going to disrupt the regrowth of the ecosystem in unexpected/abnormal ways. Concern is that it leads to a long term cycle of more, hotter, larger fires and permanent habitat loss.
We are Australia, we have fires every year. We understand that forests burn naturally, and we understand what that looks like. It's taught to every second grader during fire season.
This isn't that.
Forests have not evolved to deal with that.
What will definitely not grow back is the 2,000 homes destroyed.