> Because of git's shortcomings polyrepo is a near necessity
I'm intrigued by this claim. I've come to the opposite conclusion - that monorepo is near necessity with git because there's no tools for branching/rebasing multiple repos at once.
I'm intrigued by this claim. I've come to the opposite conclusion - that monorepo is near necessity with git because there's no tools for branching/rebasing multiple repos at once.
Which one you should use depends on which downsides are less impactful for your use case.
I would use it for storing and syncing libraries of large images for my photography, if it were feasible.