Hacker News Reader

Comment by icedchai | Hacker News Reader

Almost any tech heavy ETF such as XLK or VGT will get you there. 10 year yearly returns are over 15%. For less risk, you could do a total stock market index like VTSAX (10 year returns around 13%.) Nothing is guaranteed or "continuous" though. This is less risky than investing in a single, private company that probably has little liquidity.

View on HN

Looking at 10 year returns isn't good enough because we have been in a bull market for over ten years. You need to increase the horizon to get more accurate returns

Why would a private SaaS that sells to companies do better than the public markets in bear market? If anything if the market suddenly turns then holding a stake in a company that is illiquid is worse because you can’t sell if you need to.

Being (1) private, and (2) moderately-sized, allows you to adapt more quickly - same reason why buyouts of public companies usually end with delisting. Useful thing in a downturn!

This is going to be one hell of a bear market. Can't wait.

> VTSAX

the past 10 years, yeah. but the prior 10 years were much worse.

True. But do you think they were better for private tech companies? Maybe if you lucked out with the next Google. More than likely, you got a dot-bomb that lost 90% of its valuation and was sold for pennies on the dollar...

Private tech companies growing at 15% were not the "dot-bombs".

But many, many others were, or did "okay" but got nowhere near 15% growth. What makes you think you invested in one of the better ones?

Were you around during that time? Everyone thought they were going to have the next Amazon. Most folks wound up with Pets.com.

I was around, just barely — had my first startup job in early 2000.

There certainly were a lot of bad companies without meaningful revenue seeking and getting investments, just like today.

But if you'd invested only in profitable small software companies doing 15% growth back in 2000, I think you'd have done well.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com