If you don't want to end up with a messy divorce of your own you have to get out there, observe healthy relationships and try to form some of your own.
But to be fair, our knee-jerk reaction to 'addiction' is abstinence and that philosophy is debilitating. Anyone whose spent any time dealing with addiction (as opposed to just making an ass of yourself by reacting to it) will have at least encountered the concept that you have to crowd out undesirable activities with desirable ones. You don't just 'stop drinking'. You also get too busy to be blitzed all the time.
You may or may not also have to abstain. There are games my friends want to play that I won't because I always get sucked in far deeper and longer than they do. Most alcoholics never touch a drop again. That said, I know a 20 year sober alcoholic who figured out he was self-medicating for anxiety, sought treatment, made big lifestyle changes, and can now have a beer once in a while without hulking out.
He’s said to be controversial like Peterson, he talks about the same topics, but from a male-feminist point of view, as he was president of the New York chapter of the National Organization for Women (Peterson is on the opposite spectrum as a Christian/conservative, Farrell is rather a leftist/equalitarian. Both controversial but raising good points).
And I'm looking now at my younger cousins being accused of addiction as well, yet it's clearly not. They're see switching games repeatedly, but their parents can't differentiate so it looks like they're stuck on one thing indefinitely. But reality is much simpler -- they aren't well socialized, and their friend circles are also not very well socialized, so they spend most of their time on games. Sometimes together, on multiplayer games, or solo, and then talk about it together later.
But it's clear they're not addicted -- they just don't know how to do anything else. eg they can't successfully gather a group to go to the beach, and neither can their friends, and thus they only know of the beach as somewhere to go with as family (which is never that much fun), and thus the whole circle has no real concept of going to the beach as a group of friends, and so no one in that circle even attempts it, so the concept is never learned.
And then the fix, taking away the games, manages to accomplish nothing.. they still don't know what to do. Their friend circle is naturally not going to switch to some sport, or whatever movie, or whatever else, because it's not in their culture. But their culture isn't developed/exposed enough to do anything else. So they're stuck, bored, and just waiting to get back to the one thing they know how to do.
In my case, I'm pretty sure my parents could have fixed the "problem" with something like paintball, if they really wanted to get me out of the house, or DnD if they wanted me to socialize more in-person. But my parents were too far removed from the problem to think of anything other than what they would do (my father was social, and would have done the standard set of social activities, and my mother only knew to study). Paintball/DnD were however culturally close to be inherently interesting to my friend circle.
The alternative is parents trying things at random until the kid accidentally finds a new friend circle or interest (eg send them to Mongolia, whatever kids camp, whatever classes).
Claiming addiction is IME the easy way out of actually understanding the problem at hand (in my cousin's case, not properly socialized)
Parents thought he was socially impaired. Turned out he was an organizer and leader among his peer group.