I guess it's not good for ads/tracking, hence the blocking too
For the record, BBC news site has never had any ads. The content is fully paid for and financed by the British public through TV licensing fees. And they go the extra mile to not even appear promoting any products or companies in their reporting ("other companies doing X exist".)
OTOH, they do have a ton of trackers and other spy technology on their site. My uBlock Origin shows six blocked tracking domains. So even though BBC is not profiting from dislaying ads to visitors, they are still gifting their behaviour data to American tracking companies for free.
BBC is made up of several entities and only some of them are publicly funded. Other parts, such as the BBC world news and several of the BBC’s online sites, are indeed for-profit companies that run ads [1]:
> Unlike the BBC's domestic channels, BBC World News is owned and operated by BBC Global News Ltd., part of the BBC's commercial group of companies, and is funded by subscription and advertising revenues, and not by the United Kingdom television licence.
And even the ones that are publicly funded still show ads to visitors from outside the UK [2]:
>We've introduced advertising to visitors outside of the UK because the new revenue created will allow us to further improve our journalism, our programmes and our website in the years ahead.
I am pretty sure it didn't use to be like this. BBC was one of the few sites that didn't show ads even without ad blocker.
editted for correctness. My first statement was false. My apologies. https://medium.com/@derek./how-is-nordvpn-unblocking-disney-...
Oldpost: ~~Are you aware of the possibility that you're an exit node for the related NordVPN services?~~