Churnalism pops up again, its proverbial ugly head once again raised for the cliches, its existence in this article thoroughly destroying its validity right down to its core assumptions, so that nothing remains to rise from its ashes.

How long has it been since the "Amazonian tribe that cannot count" has been refuted? What is the name of this "Amazonian tribe?" How did the anthropologist hear of the existence of this tribe? How did he contact with it? How long did he study with it? How many people did it claim before it was made extinct by logging operations?

So many other questions that I'll bet could not be answered because that damned "Amazonian tribe that can only count in binary" never existed.