Stackoverflow does it best - provide a filter for jobs that don't provide compensation info.
I'll also look into adding a filter to exclude those without salary listing but can't promise any timeline on that.
https://remoteok.io/hire-remotely
BTW how are you getting listings?
The listings come from feeds of numerous job sites and applicant tracking systems. I run them through custom filters to pull out the ones that are specifically remote-friendly.
Another interesting coincidence is that he has levels.io and I have level.io (I registered it about 4 years prior to him).
To make things even stranger, he posted my exact birthday on a mock ID he created for his blog (Feb 20, 86): https://levels.io/remote-worker-visa/
"coder" isn't a great choice of search term. If that's what you searched for, that's what you'll get as the search results are based on the job description, as well as the technology tags.
How do they make decisions and include remote workers?
How do they do meetings? Daily standups using camera or just a slackbot? No meetings at all? Weekly meetings? Figure out what you like and filter from there.
One thing you must look out for and ask about it remote culture. I've worked at companies where on-premises engineers had more say than remote engineers. If leadership doesn't stomp that behavior out immediately, the company will skew towards that. Leadership must make a conscious effort to create and encourage remote working culture.
Also, I realise this is an MVP, so no issue. Hope it does well.
I believe it may be a cache issue from our original build and you having visited previously. If you could, please hard-refresh (Ctrl+F5) or visit the job portal directly: https://portal.remote.io/
I'll work on a quick temporary fix as well.
If your issue persists, please contact us with the address of the page that you were on previously when you clicked to post so we can investigate further.
I originally registered it with the intent of building a remote monitoring and management tool or an infrastructure provider company but never got around to doing either venture.
The remote job site came about because I realized I was getting a lot of unintentional traffic from people searching for remote jobs. As it wasn't a terribly difficult venture, I decided to build it out and see how it went and so far, it's done well.
When searching, you can see the number of results returned at the top left.
EDIT: I did find an error that was sometimes causing auto-complete and search to not work. This has been resolved.
The problem is that a separate index must first be built to assign all related tags to job listings as some don't have any and others don't have all related ones.
Once that is completed, the search functionality will be reverted to what it was initially with the ability to search by strings and/or tech tags individually.
I've been contemplating how I'm going to achieve this for a couple weeks and have a pretty good model in mind but no ETA on when it will be implemented.
You should make it free to post a job.
There is no traffic on this site
I would post a job for http://textita.com but $300.00 for a zero web traffic website is crazy
I initially launched it in September but that was more of a soft launch to see if it would be worth my time and the traffic has been increasing. The past 2 days have been a bit higher with this HN post and averaged between 4-5k unique visitors / day.
There's an entire industry around that called Cash Parking. There's at least four different remote job sites with similar domains that I receive traffic (and email) for if you'd like to look those up to make some more pointless comments.
I recently heard about this racket, did not realise how developed it was. And I find it really amusing. So...please link them too. Not sure why people are so against it? The site you are slightly ripping off is not original.
The activity should be called cheekySEO :)