Fed study finds US tariffs backfired
marketwatch.com
marketwatch.com
The most frustrating thing is watching this pattern repeat itself thousands of times.
The tax cuts briefly juiced growth, but not to the predicted 4% growth. Now growth is back down to 2%. Tariffs might be a contributor.
Isn't growth supposed to fluctuate ? I'm not well versed in economic theory (and this might not be totally relevant to the article) but from what I hear/read around me, growth (whatever that means) can't be sustained in linear fashion.
What are the counterarguments to that ? (not trying to start a crusade, I'm genuinely asking)
Tariffs can't produce any net growth, they can just juice short term growth at the expense of long term growth, and they can produce localized growth (ie for US steelmakers) at the expense of the broad domestic sector (ie all US manufacturers that use steel).
In general, tariffs are an own-goal. Trump had to implement new subsidies for US agricultural firms on the order of tens of billions of dollars annually (and has cost more than twice what Obama's big three automaker bailout cost) to prevent the collapse of US ag that lost a ton of export business because of the tariffs. If we could get China to stop stealing US intellectual property, perhaps the tariffs would be worthwhile, but there is a zero percent chance that will happen.
Tariffs are just bad economic policy.