"Company in tobacco industry that tries to get children addicted plagiarizes slides"
Relatively nice journalism by Buzzfeed, but I think there are better topics to report on Juul if you're appealing to ethics.
Relatively nice journalism by Buzzfeed, but I think there are better topics to report on Juul if you're appealing to ethics.
They didn't just plagiarize the slides, they neutered them, and then attempted to pass them off as Stanford endorsed research; all without permission from the author.
So they're derivative works of PPT slides? Does that count as theft? How much do you need to change a slide before it's a new work?
>attempted to pass them off as Stanford endorsed research
As in falsifying a conclusion or reinterpreting the data?