What about the possibility that the inclusion of those stars in those 1950's star catalogs was a result of human error, instrument error, or scientific fraud?
What about the possibility that the inclusion of those stars in those 1950's star catalogs was a result of human error, instrument error, or scientific fraud?
Looking at the brightness of the source that went missing, it is hard to suggest instrumental error - much fainter stars remain detectable in both epochs.
And fraud, really? Who would bother to fake stars in catalogs and plates in the 1950s, and why?
I think if there is an instrumental error it would more plausibly be the opposite. That the bright stars are artifacts in the images.
Stellar cartographers aren't selling unique branded star catalogs, so there is no reason to complain if someone has copied your data. The incentives are completely different.