Apis Cor builds world's largest 3D-printed building in Dubai
dezeen.com
dezeen.com
I believe a combination of printing prefab pieces at the site in a controlled environment could also be a great possibility.
When I voiced something about their engineering during an event, they weren't really able to reply with anything other than recital of their marketing.
IMHO, in its current iteration, 3d printed building are completely nonviable commercially.
The main point of 3d is to expensive, and error prone manual labour with a single pass automated process. 3D printed buildings as of now require more labour, more operations, and more materials than most conventional building techniques.
If we embrace exposed conduit, exposed ducting and exposed plumbing lines, printed homes could be an order of magnitude cheaper.
Construction technologies to make lowrise housing super duper cheap are already here: panels, lgsf, large prefabs, light concretes
And for really tall highrises, they are already coming within 50-40% of their materials costs in Asian countries. So for them, it will make no difference even in the most optimistic case.
You can't do much physically about price of steel and cement, other than finding ways to use less of them.
So what is the net benefit of this process?
I don't know how much these machines will cost in the future, but I do know that I would love to have one. Construction is very expensive even for houses that are basically sticks and stucco. I would like to buy some land and print a house with modules for plumbing, electrical, etc. This enables a complete rethink of how we currently build homes.
Which is not to say you couldn’t get a hold of one. I’d guess that, when the tech matures, you’d be able to rent one from your local maker-space :)
I think a prefab 4' x 8' section of steel frame and foam wall that could be bolted together with channels for interconnecting utilities would make truly plug-and-play style housing.
If construction is labor-intensive and expensive, stick framing is the cheapest and easiest part. If you come up with an automated solution that replaces the need for expensive interior finishing processes, you’ll have a huge market... finishing out existing stick-framed construction. No one selling houses wants this.
If you want to use modern technology to mass-produce homes with less labor, that’s called prefabricated construction and it’s a process that’s only about a thousand years old. Someday robots will do it all automatically on-site but we’re no where near doing that in the foreseeable future, in part because the demands on houses are predictably rising at pace with the capabilities of robots.
I don’t mean to be snide, but this is a little like dropping by a homebuilding forum and they’re all talking about how some day soon desktop PCB fabrication is going to replace all of Silicon Valley, because they don’t quite know the difference between a chip and a circuit board. It’s just embarrassing, y’all.
There is already a large panel prefab process, which is highly automated, including finishing, but it doesn't seem to be anywhere near "revolutionising" the industry.
The thing is, in North America the preference for single family houses is so strong that making people care about extra $100k is really hard.
They are not consumer facing. They are looking for partnerships and investment.