Lots of real modern slavery in the US and elsewhere regardless of your personal opinions about it.
Additionally you have failed to address anything about my point concerning precision of definition, except perhaps _very_ obliquely by using the phrase "real modern slavery" to deselect chattel slavery.
I do not question that some (many) form(s) of slavery exist(s). I was the one that suggested a form of slavery you might have meant.
When your terms are overbroad, you fail to communicate (as has happened in this topic). Clarity is your responsibility as a writer.
Is your concern that slaves are not being bought and sold as property? Well they are bought and sold in many of these cases. Not all of them are, but not all slaves in plantation days were bought and sold either. You're trying to claim that slavery doesn't exist because you want to make it be only something exactly the same as plantation era slavery, which is an absurd claim for which there is no justification.
It is also what people think of first when someone starts talking about slavery. Alongside chattel slavery was indentured servitude, which might well fall into your definition of slavery.
>You're trying to claim that slavery doesn't exist because you want to make it be only something exactly the same as plantation era slavery
No, I am not. I am asking you to be more precise in your language, because typing off a one-line post about non-hypothetical slavery was confusing. Notice how more people upvoted you when you were expanded the precision of what you meant by slavery?