The First Credit Card Ever (2016)
saturdayeveningpost.com
saturdayeveningpost.com
It sounds like a success right from the get go. But I don’t understand the motivation of those early adopters. Don’t compare it to today’s impossibility of renting a car without a credit card, the growing hostility to cash in Western countries, and the normalcy of buying all your stuff online. None of that applies to 1950.
Remember that this was only for restaurants at the time. And this was a charge card that requires you to pay your bill in full every month, meaning that you could afford those restaurants. You could not spread your bill over a period of months or years.
> We went over all the good points of the idea: You don’t have to carry a lot of cash. And perhaps most importantly, you have a receipt for a tax write-off if you take out a potential customer or client.
You don’t need to crazy amounts of cash for dinner for one night. Besides, carrying cash was normal. In 1950, it was not unusual to buy a car with cash. You could always get a restaurant receipt even if you paid cash. None of the justifications in the article makes sense to me.
My theory is that those early adopters signed up because the card gave the illusion of status or eliteness. You show this magic card to the waiter, sign your name, and you walk out without paying any money. All the other use cases and benefits (and detriments) of credit cards came in later years.
Like, there was definitely a status element to it but I think that's overlooking some real advantages which were uniquely applicable to that experience.
I recently switched to a public transport card that stores all my trips and gives me a single invoice at the end of the month that is automatically debited from my bank account (SEPA Direct Debit). Before I had to constantly top up my card with money (prepaid) or buy individual tickets. I really like this system!
This is also the reason that sanctions don’t work.
But yes, I think the cool factor of taking some friends or clients to a restaurant and walking out without paying contributed as well.
It's interesting, I have no idea what you're talking about.
I just rented a car in the UK three days ago without a credit card, and I still use cash for every single purchase except plane tickets online, which is the only reason I even have one.
Note, I live in Canada/Australia, spent the whole summer in the US and I'm just visiting the UK.
Did they give you a discount for cash? If not, why on earth would you ever throw away the free extra insurance that you get with a credit card?
Also, keep in mind, you're paying for it one way or another. There is no such thing as free.
This thread is about doing something in the United Kingdom, isn't it? Why are you bringing up America?
> Also, keep in mind, you're paying for it one way or another. There is no such thing as free.
If the choice is to pay the same amount in cash, or on a card, and you only get the insurance on a card, then for all practical purposes the insurance is free. You cannot pay less if you give up the insurance. There is no extra cost to you to use it.
I personally found this a bit more startling. How did they convince restauranteurs in 1950 that this was a good value proposition for them?
"Can't, we didn't bring enough cash with us."
* Actually, there were a lot of "credit cards" when Diners Club started the business. One of the oldest such cards is one issued by Shell (oil company) circa 1920, predating more than a decade.
* The real innovation of Diners Club's card was that it was general purpose. It could be used for multiple merchandises, while other cards were very purpose-specific (e.g. Mobil card for purchasing gas from the store, Western Union card for its telegraph service).
A good resource to read about the origin of credit cards is "The credit card industry: A History" By Lewis Mandell.
> My theory is that those early adopters signed up because the card gave the illusion of status or eliteness
The primary motivation to own diners cards was post-pay. To put it simply: you can eat a dish without paying for it now. That was appealing for people who just started to enjoy consuming stuffs. Yes, you still need to pay the full amount every month, but minimum monthly payment (a.k.a. revolving credit) was an innovation yet to be conceived...
In addition to some of the card’s unique features mentioned by other posters, being able flaunt a status symbol to friends, customers, and business associates played no small part in the success of the card.
Electronic Value Exchange (https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781849961387) is a great book on the history of card payments. Well researched and very thorough. I’m told its commonly recommended internally at Stripe.
This blog has an amazing history of Visa, as well as a very deep breakdown of its financials. Probably a very interesting read for anyone reading these comments.
https://minesafetydisclosures.com/blog/2019/5/29/part-l-a-hi...
I haven't seen that for credit credit cards (maybe due to the often-delayed auth cycles), but many debit cards (where charges are done in realtime) where I live do it by default, and my Amex sends you phone notifications if you add it in Apple Pay (even for transactions that were not done through Apple Pay)
Just check your statement before paying the bill, and if you lose your card, freeze it. Also, most credit cards will inform you of purchases somehow, so maybe you need to get a new card.
This is true mostly if it's a magstripe or "card-not-present" transaction, or done online without two-factor authentication.
Otherwise, the burden tends to fall onto the cardholder to provide some form of proof that their card details were compromised.
Does anyone have a link to the earliest known credit card compromise to complement this article? I'll research it and see what I can find.