curious why you were giving feedback in person if you expect candidates to not say anything back. what were your expectations during this process?
did you set expectations with the candidates before the call that they are not supposed to question your analysis?
It's a bit like arguing with a potential romantic partner who doesn't want to go on a second date: You might win the argument logically, but you're not getting another date unless there was a comical misunderstanding.
I was asking why gp was doing this ^, seems weird.
This is also why people get ghosted while dating nowadays. Many of the same reasons at play.
But I am asking do ppl respond to this with a phone call detailing the reasons behind their rejection.
Why was OP doing it.
His problem could've been simply solved by setting the expectation that his analysis was not up for debate.
I'm not sure I understand this. I'm under the impression that ghosting people while dating is a newish phenomenon. Is requesting justifications a similarly newish thing? If one didn't change, why would the other? It doesn't seem like we've gotten to the root of the matter.