Agreed, but it does not make sending him funds illegal by virtue of being enemy of the state ( although I will admit I struggle with parsing that phrase ), which is the question posed by the original poster.

Edit: brackets

edit2: also, the fact that he may be potentially indicted does not mean it is illegal to give him money. Those are two separate issues

Ok. I am not an attorney. My views are my own. No purchase necessary. Not FDIC insured. YMMV. Consult a real lawyer. Don't be an idiot.

You right in a sense that when you read this, Snowden could easily be argued to fit the mold.

However, you will note that it later says that the actual designation ( verified here with treasury link I added ) is up to SOS and other involved individuals.

Note, that at the time I checked it, Snowden was not on that list and apparently has not been since issuance of this EO.

At least not yet.

edit, because there always exceptions: see wikileaks and note neither he nor his creation was sanctioned by OFAC either. However, that did not stop the state from making donations.. challenging.

too late, I already paid the Ethiopian Football Federation