Hacker News Reader

Comment by scrollaway | Hacker News Reader

So you want mozco to go against the community's and project leaders decisions?

Do you see the problem with that line of thinking or do I have to explain further?

(Also, Rust isn't under MoCo, it's under MoFo directly.)

Rust isn't "under" either. The core team, who are ultimately in charge, don't report to anybody in the Mozilla organization.

In which way? I've thought the Rust engineers were employees of the Mozilla corporation? And the Rust trademark seems to be owned by the Mozilla corporation as well: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87796977&caseSearchType=U...

All Mozilla employees working on Rust are under Moco, not Mofo, that's correct. Unless something extremely drastic that nobody has talked about has happened in the last year.

Almost all of Mozilla is under Moco.

Yes, if you are getting paid by someone you should do what they ask of you, especially when it's something sensible.

Most Rust contributors are not Mozilla employees. Even in the core team, 3 of 9 members weren't (as of 2017, may be different today),

It is 3 of 9 today as well. (In 2017 it was higher!)

So if I give you a dollar you'll stop commenting?

If you were paying me to comment and you wanted me to stop commenting, yes definitely.

I could go my own way and comment for free (as I already do) and then I would be able to do whatever I wanted.

But as long as I am funded by you, yes I should do what you ask of me.

Wouldn't you have a choice between continuing to get paid or continuing to comment? And what if I already knew your decision would be to stop getting paid and quit HN but I still needed you to continue being on HN because your presence here was valuable to me? Would that not mean that I'm paying you, but I can't force you to do anything without harming myself much more than you?

Haven't you heard? Nuance isn't a thing anymore. All decisions are binary. Get with the times.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com