>
The rest of your opinions are, as you said, unverifiableCalling a Tokyo court's criminal judgement [1] an unverifiable opinion is problematic. (It explains the hire, I suppose.)
> we are going to learn from them
For what it's worth, I believe you're well meaning. But you've given away the keys to the kingdom. Your intentions are less relevant. (Best case, I imagine, is you pull a Jan Koum in a couple years.)
If a VPN user wants a vetted, verified, open-source client, they should use OpenVPN or WireGuard's. (If they want a convenient client, they use the VPN provider's.) The unavoidable trust in a VPN relationship is in what's running on the servers. That's a people problem. And PIA has serious people problems.
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-mt-gox-bitcoin-bigwig-fo...